← Schedule

Group G · Matchday 11 · 2026-06-21

Belgium vs Iran

Inglewood, United States · neutral venue

Most likely scoreline

1–0 13.8%

52.0%

BEL win

25.6%

Draw

22.4%

IRN win

Top scorelines

1–0 13.8%
0–0 11.6%
1–1 10.1%
2–0 9.9%

Total goals

0 to 10 goals · most likely → tallest

The agent’s call

3-agent ensemble · deepseek-chat

BEL win

56.7%

Draw

25.3%

IRN win

18.0%

Belgium's recent form is excellent and their key players (De Bruyne, Tielemans, Lukaku) are world-class, while Iran's best attacker Taremi lacks comparable support. The model's 51% home win is a reasonable baseline, but the squad quality gap justifies a modest upward adjustment to 55%. Draw and away win probabilities are slightly reduced accordingly. Belgium's expected goals (1.52) and Iran's (0.84) suggest a low-to-moderate scoring match. The most likely scorelines are 1-0 and 2-0, reflecting Belgium's defensive solidity and Iran's limited attacking threat. A 1-1 draw is possible but less likely given Belgium's form.

What the agent weighed

Recent form

Belgium have won their last four matches (WWDWW) while Iran have won three of their last five (DLWWW). → favours home
Head-to-head

No previous meetings between Belgium and Iran. → no bearing
Availability

No injuries or suspensions reported for either side. → no bearing
Key players

Belgium boast elite talent: De Bruyne (7.97 rating, 11G/3A in 21 apps), Tielemans (8.06, 9G/3A), Lukaku (6.64, 8G/2A), and Trossard (7.20, 5G/1A). Iran's top attacker Taremi (7.65, 7G/4A) is strong but the supporting cast (Jahanbakhsh 6.8, Mohebi 7.8) plays at lower club levels. Belgium's squad depth and quality are significantly higher. → favours home
Recent news

Sky Sports Group G guide notes Belgium as favourites; AP News reports Iran trained in Mexico but no tactical revelations. Fox News article about alleged spying is off-field and not relevant to match outcome. → no bearing
Conditions

SoFi Stadium is a climate-controlled dome; temperature 19.4°C, humidity 60%, wind 17.8 km/h – all neutralised indoors. → no bearing
Model vs market

Model gives Belgium 51% win probability; no market lines supplied, so model is the only quantitative prior. Given the key-player advantage, I adjust home win upward slightly. → favours home

What the agent checked on the web

Searched tavily for BEL · IRN — 6 sources kept

Agent scorelines

1–0 21%
2–0 17%
1–1 15%
0–0 14%
2–1 12%
3–0 9%

generated 2026-06-11

Last 5 — BEL

+0.20 pts/match vs model expectation · opp. avg #31

USA #35 +1.2
MEX #21 -0.8
CRO #15 +1.7
TUN #48 +0.7
EGY #37 -0.9

GF / GA last 10: 32 / 7

Last 5 — IRN

+0.22 pts/match vs model expectation · opp. avg #65

NIG #40 -1.4
COS #68 +1.2
GAM #88 +0.8
MAL #46 +1.3
NZL #83 -1.0

GF / GA last 10: 19 / 7

Head-to-head (last 5)

No prior meetings in the dataset.

▸ Full score grid (7×7)

P(home goals × away goals), %

11.6

8.5

3.7

1.3

0.4

0.1

0.0

13.8

10.1

4.5

1.5

0.4

0.1

0.0

9.9

7.2

3.2

1.1

0.3

0.1

0.0

5.5

4.0

1.8

0.6

0.2

0.0

2.6

1.9

0.9

0.3

0.1

0.0

1.1

0.8

0.4

0.1

0.0

0.5

0.3

0.1

0.0

Rows = BEL goals; columns = IRN goals. Above-diagonal cells are home wins; diagonal = draws; below = away wins. Truncated at 6 — the joint mass past that is < 1 %.

Expected goals (Poisson rate, λ)

1.57

BEL

0.86

IRN

Independent-Poisson rates. W/D/L and the score grid integrate the full 13×13 joint under these two parameters.

News context — injuries, suspensions, projected XI — is not part of the model, which sees only past results.